Bracket IQ

BACK TO Bracket IQ
basketball-men-d1 flag

Daniel Wilco | NCAA.com | March 11, 2023

The highest-scoring men's basketball games in NCAA March Madness history

Greg Anthony recalls Bo Kimble's left-handed free throw

March Madness has been around in a four-region, 60-plus team format since 1985, when the NCAA DI men's basketball tournament expanded to 64 schools, and later 68 in 2011. Since 1985, thousands of games have been played in the NCAA tournament (not counting the First Four). That’s a lot of basketball. And with a lot of basketball comes a lot of points: Hundreds of thousands, in fact.

But which of those games are responsible for the most of those points? In other words, what are the highest-scoring games in modern NCAA tournament history?

Here’s all 19 that have surpassed 200 total points:

Rank Total Winning team Score Losing team Score Year Round
1 264 No. 11 seed Loyola Marymount 149 No. 3 seed Michigan 115 1990 Second round
2 234 No. 10 seed Loyola Marymount 119 No. 7 seed Wyoming 115 1988 First round
3 232 No. 1 seed UNLV 131 No. 11 seed Loyola Marymount 101 1990 Elite Eight
4 221 No. 5 seed Arkansas 120 No. 12 seed Loyola Marymount 101 1989 First round
5 220 No. 2 seed UNC 123 No. 10 seed Loyola Marymount 97 1988 Second round
6 216 No. 7 seed West Virginia 111 No. 2 seed Wake Forest 105 2005 Second round
7 214 No. 12 seed Tulsa 112 No. 5 seed UCLA 102 1994 First round
T8 207 No. 1 seed Duke 104 No. 2 seed Kentucky 103 1992 Elite Eight
T8 207 No. 5 seed Tennessee 121 No. 12 seed Long Beach State 86 2007 First round
T10 206 No. 1 seed UNC 109 No. 9 seed Michigan 97 1987 Second round
T10 206 No. 1 seed Oklahoma 108 No. 5 seed Louisville 98 1988 Sweet 16
T10 206 No. 8 seed UCLA 105 No. 1 seed Cincinnati 101 2002 Second round
T13 205 No. 1 seed Oklahoma 124 No. 9 seed Louisiana Tech 81 1989 Second round
T13 205 No. 1 seed Missouri 109 No. 9 seed Wisconsin 96 1994 Second round
15 204 No. 2 seed Kentucky 106 No. 10 seed Iowa State 98 1992 Second round
16 203 No. 11 seed Loyola Marymount 111 No. 10 seed Iowa State 98 1990 First round
17 202 No. 9 seed UAB 102 No. 8 seed Washington 100 2004 First round
T18 200 No. 5 seed Iowa 102 No. 12 seed Florida State 98 1988 First round
T18 200 No. 12 seed Western Kentucky 101 No. 5 seed Drake 99 2008 First round

Yes, we see it, too. Somehow, Loyola Marymount is involved in all five of the highest-scoring games, and six of the top 16. Why?

In the three-year span from 1988-1990, the Lions led the NCAA in points scored per game AND points allowed per game each year. And it wasn't close:

  Loyola Marymount P/G Runner-up P/G Difference Loyola Marymount PA/G Runner-up PA/G Difference
1988 110.3 102.9 7.4 97.2 93.6 3.6
1989 112.5 102.2 10.3 107.3 96.2 11.1
1990 122.4 101.3 21.1 108.1 102 6.1

In 1990, when two of the top three highest-scoring NCAA tournament games were recorded, the Lions' games were averaging 230.5 total points — 30.7 more than the next highest team. That's about as perfect a recipe for record-breaking box scores as you can get.

During that three-year span, Loyola Marymount combined with its opponent to score more than 200 points in a game 62 times. The other five teams in the top five did that a total of just 12 times.

But the Lions were masters of getting other teams to play at their pace. Of the teams the Lions combined with to set the top five highest-scoring games, all averaged fewer than 80 points allowed per game.

What's more, only one averaged more than 90 points per game — 1990 UNLV at 93.5. The Running Rebels would go on to beat Duke in the national championship that year, 103-73 — a game that happens to be the highest-scoring championship game in modern tournament history.

Related: Hank Gathers' son remembers his father

To see exactly how these records took shape, take a look at these absurd box scores for each of the top five:

No. 1) 1990 second round: No. 11 seed Loyola Marymount 149, No. 3 seed Michigan 115

LOYOLA MARYMOUNT FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Bo Kimble 11 29 37.9% 10 21 47.6% 1 8 12.5% 14 17 82.4% 7 4 37
Jeff Fryer 15 20 75% 4 5 80% 11 15 73.3% 0 0 - 4 3 41
Per Stumer 6 9 66.7% 1 1 100% 5 8 62.5% 4 4 100% 8 2 21
Tony Walker 0 2 0% 0 2 0% 0 0 - 5 7 71.4% 3 9 5
Chris Knight 2 5 40% 2 5 40% 0 0 - 0 0 - 6 3 4
Terrell Lowery 10 17 58.8% 7 9 77.8% 3 8 37.5% 0 0 - 3 6 23
Tom Peabody 4 5 80% 4 5 80% 0 0 - 6 6 100% 3 5 14
Marcellus Lee 1 1 100% 0 0 - 1 1 100% 0 0 - 2 0 3
Greg Walker 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 2 50% 0 0 1
John O'Connell 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Jeff Roscoe 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Marcus Slater 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Christian Scott 0 1 0% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 1 0
TEAM 49 89 55.1% 28 49 57.1% 21 40 52.5% 30 36 83.3% 38 33 149
MICHIGAN FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Rumeal Robinson 7 14 50% 5 8 62.5% 2 6 33.3% 7 10 70% 3 8 23
Terry Mills 11 16 68.8% 11 16 68.8% 0 0 - 1 2 50% 10 1 23
Demetrius Calip 2 8 25% 2 8 25% 0 0 - 6 8 75% 5 3 10
Loy Vaught 9 15 60% 9 15 60% 0 0 - 1 3 33.3% 17 0 19
Mike Griffin 2 4 50% 2 4 50% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 5 4
Sean Higgins 5 13 38.5% 4 9 44.4% 1 4 25% 4 4 100% 3 2 15
Michael Talley 1 3 33.3% 1 2 50% 0 1 0% 1 2 50% 2 1 3
Tony Tolbert 7 11 63.6% 6 9 66.7% 1 2 50% 1 1 100% 2 1 16
Eric Riley 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 0 0 - 3 0 2
Chris Seter 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
James Voskuil 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
TEAM 45 85 52.9% 41 72 56.9% 4 13 30.8% 21 30 70% 46 21 115

 

No. 2) 1988 first round: No. 10 seed Loyola Marymount 119, No. 7 seed Wyoming 115

LOYOLA MARYMOUNT FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Mike Yoest 5 9 55.6% 5 9 55.6% 0 0 - 15 17 88.2% 9 2 25
Hank Gathers 9 15 60% 9 15 60% 0 0 - 1 4 25% 12 2 19
Bo Kimble 12 22 54.5% 8 13 61.5% 4 9 44.4% 1 3 33.3% 2 3 29
Mark Armstrong 6 8 75% 6 8 75% 0 0 - 3 5 60% 8 2 15
Corey Gaines 3 9 33.3% 3 7 42.9% 0 2 0% 3 4 75% 2 10 9
Jeff Fryer 5 11 45.5% 2 5 40% 3 6 50% 4 4 100% 3 1 17
Enoch Simmons 2 8 25% 1 5 20% 1 3 33.3% 0 0 - 4 3 5
John Veargason 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
TEAM 42 82 51.2% 34 62 54.8% 8 20 40% 27 37 73% 40 23 119
WYOMING FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Eric Leckner 10 17 58.8% 10 17 58.8% 0 0 - 3 4 75% 8 2 23
Fennis Dembo 5 11 45.5% 5 8 62.5% 0 3 0% 4 6 66.7% 7 8 14
Robyn Davis 9 15 60% 8 13 61.5% 1 2 50% 0 0 - 6 1 19
Willie Jones 4 7 57.1% 4 7 57.1% 0 0 - 4 6 66.7% 10 5 12
Turk Boyd 4 11 36.4% 4 8 50% 0 3 0% 1 1 100% 5 3 9
Sean Dent 2 3 66.7% 2 3 66.7% 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 6 4
Reggie Fox 7 9 77.8% 5 5 100% 2 4 50% 0 0 - 2 3 16
Clauzell Williams 3 4 75% 1 2 50% 2 2 100% 3 4 75% 3 0 11
Jonathan Sommers 2 2 100% 2 2 100% 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 4
David Lodgins 0 1 0% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Rod Tyson 1 2 50% 0 0 - 1 2 50% 0 0 - 1 0 3
Kurt Samuels 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
TEAM 47 82 57.3% 41 66 62.1% 6 16 37.5% 15 21 71.4% 44 29 115

 

No. 3) 1990 Elite Eight: No. 1 seed UNLV 131, No. 11 seed Loyola Marymount 101

UNLV FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Anderson Hunt 11 23 47.8% 7 11 63.6% 4 12 33.3% 4 6 66.7% 4 13 30
Larry Johnson 10 14 71.4% 10 14 71.4% 0 0 - 0 1 0% 18 5 20
Stacey Augmon 13 20 65% 13 20 65% 0 0 - 7 7 100% 11 6 33
Greg Anthony 8 10 80% 5 6 83.3% 3 4 75% 2 3 66.7% 1 8 21
David Butler 4 7 57.1% 4 7 57.1% 0 0 - 1 5 20% 8 2 9
Moses Scurry 3 4 75% 3 4 75% 0 0 - 2 2 100% 4 0 8
Stacey Cvijanovich 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 2 100% 2 0 2
James Jones 2 3 66.7% 2 3 66.7% 0 0 - 3 4 75% 3 0 7
Barry Young 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 0 0
Travis Bice 0 4 0% 0 2 0% 0 2 0% 1 2 50% 1 1 1
Dave Rice 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
Chris Jeter 0 1 0% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
TEAM 51 86 59.3% 44 68 64.7% 7 18 38.9% 22 32 68.8% 56 35 131
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Bo Kimble 14 32 43.8% 6 21 28.6% 8 11 72.7% 6 6 100% 11 3 42
Jeff Fryer 7 24 29.2% 3 8 37.5% 4 16 25% 3 3 100% 6 2 21
Per Stumer 2 4 50% 2 2 100% 0 2 0% 0 0 - 5 2 4
Tony Walker 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 2 3 66.7% 2 3 4
Chris Knight 4 8 50% 4 8 50% 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 2 8
Terrell Lowery 6 16 37.5% 2 7 28.6% 4 9 44.4% 2 2 100% 0 6 18
Tom Peabody 0 2 0% 0 0 - 0 2 0% 0 1 0% 2 4 0
John O'Connell 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 2 50% 2 0 1
Marcellus Lee 1 2 50% 0 1 0% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 0 0 3
Jeff Roscoe 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
Marcus Slater 0 2 0% 0 2 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
Greg Walker 0 1 0% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
Christian Scott 0 2 0% 0 2 0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 1 0
TEAM 35 94 37.2% 18 53 34% 17 41 41.5% 14 17 82.4% 34 23 101

 

No. 4) 1989 first round: No. 5 seed Arkansas 120, No. 12 seed Loyola Marymount 101

ARKANSAS FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Lee Mayberry 8 14 57.1% 7 13 53.8% 1 1 100% 2 6 33.3% 2 8 19
Lenzie Howell 10 11 90.9% 10 11 90.9% 0 0 - 7 11 63.6% 12 0 27
Keith Wilson 4 13 30.8% 4 11 36.4% 0 2 0.0% 1 3 33.3% 11 12 9
Mario Credit 14 21 66.7% 14 21 66.7% 0 0 - 6 9 66.7% 13 0 34
Todd Day 7 12 58.3% 6 9 66.7% 1 3 33.3% 5 6 83.3% 2 4 20
Arlyn Bowers 2 7 28.6% 2 5 40% 0 2 0% 3 4 75% 1 3 7
Oliver Miller 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 0.0% 5 0 0
Darrell Hawkins 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 2
Cannon Whitby 1 2 50% 1 1 100% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 1 1 2
Shawn Davis 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 2 0
TEAM 47 81 58% 45 72 62.5% 2 9 22.2% 24 41 58.5% 48 30 120
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Hank Gathers 12 24 50% 12 24 50% 0 0 - 4 11 36.4% 17 1 28
Bo Kimble 7 23 30.4% 5 12 41.7% 2 11 18.2% 8 9 88.9% 10 3 24
Jeff Fryer 7 28 25% 2 6 33.3% 5 22 22.7% 5 5 100% 8 1 24
Per Stumer 2 7 28.6% 1 4 25% 1 3 33.3% 1 2 50% 8 1 6
Tom Peabody 1 4 25% 1 3 33.3% 0 1 0% 0 1 0% 4 4 2
John Veargason 3 7 42.9% 3 7 42.9% 0 0 - 0 0 - 7 0 6
Terrell Lowery 2 3 66.7% 1 1 100% 1 2 50% 2 2 100% 2 1 7
Terry Mister 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 2 100% 0 1 2
John O'Connell 1 2 50% 1 2 50% 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 1 2
TEAM 35 98 35.7% 26 59 44.1% 9 39 23.1% 22 32 68.8% 58 13 101

 

No. 5) 1988 second round: No. 2 seed UNC 123, No. 10 seed Loyola Marymount 97

UNC FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Jeff Lebo 6 9 66.7% 3 5 60% 3 4 75% 4 4 100% 5 7 19
J.R. Reid 8 10 80% 8 10 80% 0 0 - 3 6 50% 15 5 19
Kevin Madden 7 9 77.8% 7 9 77.8% 0 0 - 2 2 100% 4 9 16
Scott Williams 3 3 100% 3 3 100% 0 0 - 2 2 100% 8 3 8
Steve Bucknall 5 7 71.4% 5 7 71.4% 0 0 - 3 5 60% 5 3 13
Rick Fox 4 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0% 0 0 - 0 0 - 4 4 8
Ranzino Smith 11 14 78.6% 8 9 88.9% 3 5 60% 2 3 66.7% 4 0 27
Pete Chilcutt 2 2 100% 2 2 100% 0 0 - 1 3 33.3% 6 2 5
King Rice 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 2 2 100% 1 2 4
Joe Jenkins 1 2 50% 1 2 50% 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 1 2
Jeff Denny 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0
Rodney Hyatt 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 2
Doug Elstun 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
David May 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
TEAM 49 62 79% 43 53 81.1% 6 9 66.7% 19 27 70.4% 54 36 123
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT FG FGA FG% 2P 2PA 2P% 3P 3PA 3P% FT FTA FT% TRB AST PTS
Corey Gaines 5 20 25% 4 15 26.7% 1 5 20% 5 6 83.3% 1 10 16
Mike Yoest 2 10 20% 2 9 22.2% 0 1 0% 6 10 60% 12 2 10
Bo Kimble 3 21 14.3% 2 12 16.7% 1 9 11.1% 1 2 50% 3 1 8
Mark Armstrong 3 7 42.9% 3 7 42.9% 0 0 - 1 2 50% 3 1 7
Hank Gathers 7 17 41.2% 7 17 41.2% 0 0 - 3 10 30% 12 0 17
Enoch Simmons 4 11 36.4% 0 2 0% 4 9 44.4% 0 0 - 4 2 12
Jeff Fryer 9 16 56.3% 2 2 100% 7 14 50% 2 2 100% 2 1 27
John Veargason 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 2 0 0
Marcus Slater 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 0 0
Pat Meyer 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Marcellus Lee 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
Jeff Roscoe 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0
TEAM 33 103 32% 20 64 31.3% 13 39 33.3% 18 32 56.3% 39 17 97
 
1939-49 Brackets: 1939 |1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949
1950s: 1950 | 1951 |1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959
1960s: 1960 | 1961 | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 |1967 | 1968 | 1969
1970s: 1970 | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 
1980s: 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 19841985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989
1990s: 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999
2000s: 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010s: 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 
COVID-19 and college sports: Latest updates and schedules

How much experience coaches have when they reach their first Final Four

A look at the years of experience (as a head coach) it took each NCAA coach to reach the Final Four in March Madness.
READ MORE

March Madness brackets: How do seeds perform in the Final Four?

When thinking about Final Four picks, what should you look for?
READ MORE

March Madness: Getting to know the No. 5 seed in the NCAA tournament

Here's a detailed history of how No. 5 seeds have fared in the NCAA tournament.
READ MORE

Subscribe To Email Updates

Enter your information to receive emails about offers, promotions from NCAA.com and our partners